Jump to content

Photo

WWE '13: IGN Review



Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 120 days old. Post only if you have something relevant to add to the discussion.


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1
OFFLINE   SimonSDH

SimonSDH

    - The Gov -

  • Owner
  • 3,397 posts

Awards:

Users Awards

>>CLICK HERE - LINK<<





#2
OFFLINE   Noob Saibot

Noob Saibot

    ChampOwensChamp

  • Hall of Fame
  • 14,518 posts

Awards:

Users Awards
Don't get how '12 got best mark ...

#3
OFFLINE   Nic Virtue

Nic Virtue

    Entertainer

  • Hall of Fame
  • 1,937 posts

Awards:

Users Awards

Don't get how '12 got best mark ...


I believe they were payed off to give that game a "9". As for WWE'13, It looks like a pretty deserving score. If anything from the looks of it, WWE'13 should have gotten the 9 and WWE'12 should have gotten a 5.5. Then again, reviews are only based off 1 persons expereance, and should never be taken to heart IMO.

#4
OFFLINE   Viper

Viper

    nacho

  • Member
  • 3,109 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Maldives

Awards:

Users Awards
I don't know if they are right about the rating, but i can only judge about this after playing the game.

#5
OFFLINE   Darkwolf23PT

Darkwolf23PT

    Jobber

  • Member
  • 214 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Portugal
i have the game already and is "MUCH BETTER" than wwe 12 but one thing i can t do is exibiition matches for titles anyone that have the game know how to do it ?

Edited by Darkwolf23PT, 29 October 2012 - 07:01 PM.


#6
OFFLINE   MEHRDAD

MEHRDAD

    Backyard Wrestler

  • Member
  • 29 posts
REALLY!!!REALLY!!!

LOTS OF IMPROVMENTS IN THIS GAME AND IT'S BETTER THAN WWE '12 AT ALL.
BUT WHY 8.4???
I HAVE THE GAME ALREADY.
IT'S REALLY PERFECT.

#7
OFFLINE   Mohd Jeffrey Zin

Mohd Jeffrey Zin

    Midcarder

  • Member
  • 882 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Good call IGN. they get their review scores back to it's roots.

You're Welcome. *Damien Sandow Quote*

I mean remember last time they gave SVR08 a 7.8 & SVR09 a 7.9 instead of 7.0 - 7.5 (I remember Resident Evil 6 was 7.9 but Gamespot & others hated it by gave it a low score which it's unfair)? I wonder what's the other reviewers (Game informer, Gamespot & Others oh wait, I don't really care anymore) say about this one.

I believe they were payed off to give that game a "9". As for WWE'13, It looks like a pretty deserving score. If anything from the looks of it, WWE'13 should have gotten the 9 and WWE'12 should have gotten a 5.5. Then again, reviews are only based off 1 persons experience, and should never be taken to heart IMO.


Ok, IGN & G4 liked it but others like Gametrailers, Game informer didn't and then gave it a low score instead which it's unfair & plain ridiculous even though Metacritic gave '12 a 76/100.

Edited by Jeffrey Zin, 29 October 2012 - 07:17 PM.


#8
OFFLINE   Viper

Viper

    nacho

  • Member
  • 3,109 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Maldives

Awards:

Users Awards

REALLY!!!REALLY!!!

LOTS OF IMPROVMENTS IN THIS GAME AND IT'S BETTER THAN WWE '12 AT ALL.
BUT WHY 8.4???
I HAVE THE GAME ALREADY.
IT'S REALLY PERFECT.

If you were IGN, what rating will you give?

#9
OFFLINE   Noob Saibot

Noob Saibot

    ChampOwensChamp

  • Hall of Fame
  • 14,518 posts

Awards:

Users Awards


Don't get how '12 got best mark ...


I believe they were payed off to give that game a "9". As for WWE'13, It looks like a pretty deserving score. If anything from the looks of it, WWE'13 should have gotten the 9 and WWE'12 should have gotten a 5.5. Then again, reviews are only based off 1 persons expereance, and should never be taken to heart IMO.

'12 kinda was like a 8,2 by fails , limitations , repetitive RTW and poor AI . Yeah , most likely they did that .

#10
OFFLINE   MEHRDAD

MEHRDAD

    Backyard Wrestler

  • Member
  • 29 posts


REALLY!!!REALLY!!!

LOTS OF IMPROVMENTS IN THIS GAME AND IT'S BETTER THAN WWE '12 AT ALL.
BUT WHY 8.4???
I HAVE THE GAME ALREADY.
IT'S REALLY PERFECT.

If you were IGN, what rating will you give?

9.2

#11
OFFLINE   Mohd Jeffrey Zin

Mohd Jeffrey Zin

    Midcarder

  • Member
  • 882 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Unless other reviewers gave it a low score (4/5/6) like what they did to other games it could be a RIOT to us.

#12
OFFLINE   TheBoy

TheBoy

    Valar Morghulis

  • Moderator
  • 8,221 posts

Awards:

Users Awards
I watched the vid. I don't care about IGN reviews. What matters is what I think about the game and I'm not going to get all whiny and start crying about the rating they gave the game. I'm just gonna wait and play the game myself before I judge anything.

#13
OFFLINE   PieceOfEdin

PieceOfEdin

    Superstar

  • Member
  • 1,056 posts
I don't care what rating a game gets from reviews anymore. I still think that WWF No Mercy for N64 is the best Wrestling game ever. If that game was to be released as it is today, most peope would laugh at it.
Even if IGN had given WWE '13 a total score of 6.5 or 9.5, I still would have a good time playing it. I've played every THQ-based wrestling game since WCW/nWo World Tour (N64), and I'm not gonna stop just because some sites gave it poor rating. Same goes with any game really. 8.4 is basically in the area where most games lies these days. People are way more demanding now then they were a couple of years ago.

8.4 is okay with me. Hell, Resident Evil 6 got 4.5 from Gamespot, but I consider it to be one of the best games in the series. Doesn't really prove anything.
Why do we play games? To have a good time.

I guess we have to agree to disagree.
I'm gonna have a blast with '13 no matter the review score.

#14
OFFLINE   Mohd Jeffrey Zin

Mohd Jeffrey Zin

    Midcarder

  • Member
  • 882 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

I don't care what rating a game gets from reviews anymore. I still think that WWF No Mercy for N64 is the best Wrestling game ever. If that game was to be released as it is today, most peope would laugh at it.
Even if IGN had given WWE '13 a total score of 6.5 or 9.5, I still would have a good time playing it. I've played every THQ-based wrestling game since WCW/nWo World Tour (N64), and I'm not gonna stop just because some sites gave it poor rating. Same goes with any game really. 8.4 is basically in the area where most games lies these days. People are way more demanding now then they were a couple of years ago.

8.4 is okay with me. Hell, Resident Evil 6 got 4.5 from Gamespot, but I consider it to be one of the best games in the series. Doesn't really prove anything.
Why do we play games? To have a good time.

I guess we have to agree to disagree.
I'm gonna have a blast with '13 no matter the review score.


I watched the vid. I don't care about IGN reviews. What matters is what I think about the game and I'm not going to get all whiny and start crying about the rating they gave the game. I'm just gonna wait and play the game myself before I judge anything.


NOT just IGN my friend. because some people always said 'You can't spell ignorance without IGN' sometimes in most of their comments. And It's funny that how they didn't cover Universe mode, or understand online too well.

And seriously, that's the reason why I really couldn't trust those game reviewers whatsoever (How IGN like RE6 but gamespot didn't. WHAT IS GOIN ON HERE anyway?! I guess I fled to another universe then. And yes, I still couldn't trust Gamespot which it's bullshit & unfair like a critical backlash of Skyward Sword review). Probably I was too scared of 'The Truth' till someone is gonna cancel the pre-order I mean 'read the review first before you buy the game'.

YOU'RE WELCOME.

Edited by Jeffrey Zin, 29 October 2012 - 08:06 PM.


#15
OFFLINE   Dozer

Dozer

    Main Eventer

  • Hall of Fame
  • 4,213 posts

Awards:

Users Awards
I care some reviews. Yeah, I do read reviews before buying a game and this is one of those reviews which I do read and I do care the rating. Normally I don't read GameSpot's reviews. Other sites, yes.

No matter how good the game is this year, it shouldn't deserve 9. Sure, it deserves better than 6 at least but I will read reviews more and decide later this week will I buy it or not. And if I do buy it, it will be Xbox 360 version.

#16
OFFLINE   BombCentralGaming

BombCentralGaming

    Main Eventer

  • Supporter
  • 4,313 posts

Awards:

Users Awards
WWE 12 higher rating than WWE 13?
bs

#17
OFFLINE   Wallbreaker

Wallbreaker

    Backyard Wrestler

  • Member
  • 11 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: England
Would you prefer them to put 0 to 10 at the bottom of reviews so everyone's opinion is covered? Don't assume IGN are wrong because they gave an opinion. It is just that, an opinion. Enjoy the game. :)

#18
OFFLINE   THEE CHUCKNASTY ™

THEE CHUCKNASTY ™

    Jobber

  • Member
  • 200 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • ChrisGoBye

Awards:

Users Awards
Who gives a shit, it's one person's opinion?

#19
OFFLINE   Static

Static

    World Champion

  • Moderator
  • 8,420 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: England

Awards:

Users Awards
That was a pretty harsh review in my own opinion. The only thing they went into detail on was on the flaws, I'm not a reviewer but I thought that was pretty weak of them. Plus the camera angle thing is nothing new(was in 12)...

#20
OFFLINE   Yukeuza

Yukeuza

    Undercard

  • Member
  • 331 posts
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: South Park, Colorado
  • 1
Of course WWE'12 got a higher rating. It was a bigger improvement. That simple.



Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 120 days old. Post only if you have something relevant to add to the discussion.




Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: NEWS

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users